Write an inclusion rule
Convert the instruction into a short test such as “select findings that show new deterioration.” Use that rule for every candidate phrase.
NGN interaction guide
Highlight items turn reading into a visible selection task. Success depends on translating the prompt into a precise inclusion rule, separating decisive evidence from background detail and checking every marked phrase before submission.
Review the record and select only the findings requested by the prompt.
The client reports new difficulty breathing after walking. The earlier note describes baseline fatigue.
Interface illustration—not an official or recalled NCLEX item.
Quick answer
Current terminology includes Highlight Text and Highlight Table. Candidates select predefined words, phrases or table regions, so the task is to mark only the evidence requested by the prompt—not every abnormal detail.
A repeatable method
The format may look unfamiliar, but the work becomes manageable when you separate reading, reasoning, responding and checking.
Convert the instruction into a short test such as “select findings that show new deterioration.” Use that rule for every candidate phrase.
Establish baseline, timing and context before highlighting. A phrase can be important but still fail the requested rule.
Choose only the predefined phrases that directly answer the prompt. Avoid marking adjacent words merely because they are nearby.
For every selected phrase, state why it belongs. Deselect anything supported only by general concern rather than the exact instruction.
Decision check
Define whether the item asks for relevant cues, improvement, deterioration, teaching needs or another specific category.
Dates, times and comparison language often determine whether a phrase answers the question.
Over-selection usually starts when “important information” replaces the narrower rule in the prompt.
The prompt may ask for change, urgency or evidence supporting one hypothesis—not every abnormality.
A copied history statement and a new bedside finding can have very different relevance.
Use the predefined selectable phrase boundaries and choose only the evidence that meets the inclusion rule.
A result is useful only when it changes the next attempt. After checking a response, reconstruct the decision instead of memorizing the displayed key.
Questions, answered
It is an interaction in which the learner selects predefined words or phrases that meet the item instruction. Selection can usually be revised before moving on.
No. Select only the evidence requested by the prompt. Abnormal background information may not support the specific decision being tested.
Nursevia’s implementation uses keyboard-operable phrase controls and a text count, so the task does not depend on precise pointer movement or color alone.
The production bank contains five independently authored, source-grounded highlight items.
Free production practice
The filtered link starts the session with a highlight text item when that family is available in the sampled set. The remaining items cover other supported interactions.
Start with highlight text