What finally made retake planning feel less random?

The most useful starting point is diagnosing content gaps, missed cues, pacing, overthinking, and changed answers. If that is not clear, slow down before comparing the answer choices.

I would keep the practice narrow: classify recent misses before choosing the next study intervention. That gives you something observable to review after the set.

A common trap is repeating the first plan with more hours and a different question bank. Naming that pattern before practice can make it easier to catch in the moment.

Try explaining the decision out loud in one sentence. The explanation should connect directly to diagnosing content gaps, missed cues, pacing, overthinking, and changed answers.

I would bring this to RN review with one example where the framework worked and one where it still felt ambiguous.

The plan sounds sustainable. Recheck it after several sets and look for whether repeating the first plan with more hours and a different question bank is happening less often.